LIST 10 - BIRTHS FROM MUSTERS

 
 
In the course of analysing the various early colonial musters and the  1828  
Census,  (which are to be found later  in  this  work) numerous  entries  were  
found  which  could  not  be  positively connected with any particular set of 
parents. Entries for 65 such names  (29 males & 36 females) are listed here 
alphabetically  in surname order along with the muster or census from which they 
are derived and their year of birth.
 
These Births from Musters account for 3% of the First Generation. Males were 
43% and females 57%.
 
               Table 10.1. - Births from Musters
 
                         Total  Males  Females  
               ---------------------------------
            pre1788       3      2      1 
               1788       1      1      0
               1791       3      1      2       
               1795       2      1      1       
               1796       1      0      1       
               1797       1      0      1
               1798       4      1      3       
               1799       3      3      0       
               1800       7      5      2 
               unknown   42     12     25 
                        ------------------------
               Totals    65     29     36       
          Percentages         42.9%  57.1%      
 
A  year  of  birth  is  only known  for  22  of  the  entries  as unfortunately 
apart from the 1828 Census and 1822 Muster, most of the  musters  do  not  so 
much as give the  age  of  the  person, resulting in no way of estimating the 
year of birth. The year  of birth for Mary Ann Mullins was derived from her 
marriage.
 
As  will  become a recurring theme throughout this  book  females greatly 
outnumber males.
 
Mary  Ann Mullins managed to be recorded in four musters but  her identity  still 
evaded clarification. Esther  Campton,  Elizabeth Ellard, William McDonald, 
George Taylor & Thomas Wright were  all recorded on three occasions. Ten others 
were recorded twice.
 
Christopher Hacken's surname may possibly have been spelt Hacker.
 
Humphrey  Humphreys, Mary Smith, Ann Stoolorn &  Robert  Thompson were all 
childhood arrivals and can be found in List 11.  Fifteen were also married and 
those details can be found in List 12. 
 
Jane  Hawkins in the 1811 Muster may have been a duplicate  entry for Jane Cowling. 
Thomas Clark is known to have a younger brother William.  Elizabeth  Ellet from 
the 1814 Muster may well  be  the same  person  as  Elizabeth Ellard in the 1822  
Muster  and  1828 Census.
 
James  Hopkinson  is a special case in that he was found  in  the records  of 
the New South Wales Corps (see List 27)  rather  than from any muster.
 
               Table 10.2. - Entries per Muster
 
                    Muster         No.
                    ------------------          
                    1802             5
                    1805             2
                    1806             5
                    1811            14
                    1814            12
                    1818V            9
                    1819V            2
                    1822V            6
                    1822            11
                    1825            10
                    1828            15
                    
It  may  well  be  that some of these  names  are  variations  of existing  First 
Generation members. Otherwise these  entries  are obviously   ripe  for  further  
investigation  and  more   family groupings may well come to light as a result. 
               
Entries on this list have the reference identifier "M-C" on  List 1.


Proceed to From Musters List

Return to 1788-1800

 

Return to Children Born in the Colony Home Page or Original FFF Website Home Page or New FFF Website Home Page

 



This work is copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purposes of private study, research, criticism or review, as permitted under the Copyright Act, no part may be reproduced by any process without written permission. Enquiries should be made to the publisher.